GreenCord
07-20 05:28 AM
:rolleyes: Hi frens,
My employer filed I-140 on July 12th and at Nebraska Service Center which must have been deleivered by now. And my employer persist that they cannot file I-485 until I get receipt notice. I even came to know on another thread even without receipt notice I-485 can be filed with an application as a cover letter.
So can I do that myself without the help of the employer or I have to wait for the receipt notice.
Is there any way we can get the info by USCIS by calling them or by taking InfoPass Appointment and asking them..
Please advise. Thanks in advance.
Q-7 (07/19/2007): Since I could not file I-485 in July, I filed a stand-alone I-140 petition last week. I have yet to receive the Receipt Notice. What do I have to do?
A-7: Believe it or not, this is one of the most common questions I have received in the email. Without I-140 Receipt Notice and case number, there is absolutely no way you can file a stand-alone I-485 application. Assuming that you filed earlier and at least you found the receipt number through the cancelled check, it is still risky to file a stand-alone I-485 under the given circumstances. You can ask the USCIS "interfile to XXXXXX" without a copy of the pending I-140 receipt notice, but it is still not recommended. The option may be filing a new concurrent I-140/I-485. But predicament is lack of "original" labor certification. Service Centers have been denying such I-140 petition in a number of cases for lack of original labor certification application. The AILA may attempt to find an answer for this situation, but under the circumstances, you may not have any option other trying filing with the best evidence of I-140 petition filing proof including a copy of the cancelled filing check from the bank, federal or ups overnight delivery tracking record, complete copy of I-140 petition and supporting documentation, and I-485 application and documentation. It is better trying than doing nothing at this point. Or you can wait until first or second week to see whether you will receive the receipt notice of I-140 petition and file I-485 applicatiopn with this receipt notice. Inasmuch as you were eligible in July under the July VB, the extended period of I-485 application may work.
My employer filed I-140 on July 12th and at Nebraska Service Center which must have been deleivered by now. And my employer persist that they cannot file I-485 until I get receipt notice. I even came to know on another thread even without receipt notice I-485 can be filed with an application as a cover letter.
So can I do that myself without the help of the employer or I have to wait for the receipt notice.
Is there any way we can get the info by USCIS by calling them or by taking InfoPass Appointment and asking them..
Please advise. Thanks in advance.
Q-7 (07/19/2007): Since I could not file I-485 in July, I filed a stand-alone I-140 petition last week. I have yet to receive the Receipt Notice. What do I have to do?
A-7: Believe it or not, this is one of the most common questions I have received in the email. Without I-140 Receipt Notice and case number, there is absolutely no way you can file a stand-alone I-485 application. Assuming that you filed earlier and at least you found the receipt number through the cancelled check, it is still risky to file a stand-alone I-485 under the given circumstances. You can ask the USCIS "interfile to XXXXXX" without a copy of the pending I-140 receipt notice, but it is still not recommended. The option may be filing a new concurrent I-140/I-485. But predicament is lack of "original" labor certification. Service Centers have been denying such I-140 petition in a number of cases for lack of original labor certification application. The AILA may attempt to find an answer for this situation, but under the circumstances, you may not have any option other trying filing with the best evidence of I-140 petition filing proof including a copy of the cancelled filing check from the bank, federal or ups overnight delivery tracking record, complete copy of I-140 petition and supporting documentation, and I-485 application and documentation. It is better trying than doing nothing at this point. Or you can wait until first or second week to see whether you will receive the receipt notice of I-140 petition and file I-485 applicatiopn with this receipt notice. Inasmuch as you were eligible in July under the July VB, the extended period of I-485 application may work.
wallpaper Crimped partial updos: part
ss_col
06-23 05:35 PM
Called.
pappu
09-14 12:05 AM
I got 2 red dots for speaking my mind above. Here are the comments given by those giving red dots to me:
Do not screw up your GC by posting such comments.. delete them if you will to be safe. Admin
Your comments may screw your GC Chances. .delete them admin
First of all, who is "admin"? Is he the administrator of this forum or just someone disguising as admin?
Secondly, if these comments were true, are USCIS reading our posts and can deny my GC application due to my political beliefs and opinions?
Thirdly, if USCIS IO call "IV Admin" and ask for my IP address, will the "IV admin" give it even without my knowledge and even without court order?
Lastly, I apply for a GC in the US because I know I can freely express my mind and opinion. US is not a communist country. If because of what I said here, US will not grant me a GC, then I will fight for my rights.
The person who posed as admin and gave you reds has been banned
Do not screw up your GC by posting such comments.. delete them if you will to be safe. Admin
Your comments may screw your GC Chances. .delete them admin
First of all, who is "admin"? Is he the administrator of this forum or just someone disguising as admin?
Secondly, if these comments were true, are USCIS reading our posts and can deny my GC application due to my political beliefs and opinions?
Thirdly, if USCIS IO call "IV Admin" and ask for my IP address, will the "IV admin" give it even without my knowledge and even without court order?
Lastly, I apply for a GC in the US because I know I can freely express my mind and opinion. US is not a communist country. If because of what I said here, US will not grant me a GC, then I will fight for my rights.
The person who posed as admin and gave you reds has been banned
2011 Hairstyles and updos for your
walking_dude
10-15 05:45 PM
Michigan, find your Immigration Voice on 10/20. For when, where and what, look below!
more...
dagabaaj
09-25 11:13 AM
one I almost got when I heard my labor was rejected and I will have to start again.......:eek:
laxman
07-10 11:48 PM
Hi,
I have my H1B from company A.Now I am planning to have H1 transfer to company B. I don't have a record of the experience letters(2000 - 2003) I submitted when I filed my H1b through company A.
Now when I am applying for H1 transfer from company B can I just submit the experince letters from 2004-2007 including the letter from company A so that they don't contradict with what I have submitted before??.
I would also be submitting my education evaluation,w2s,recent paystubs etc. The problem is only with my previous experience letters.
please let me know if this is okay or can there be a problem.Any help would be greatly appreciated. This is urgent for me!!!
Thanks
Laxman
I have my H1B from company A.Now I am planning to have H1 transfer to company B. I don't have a record of the experience letters(2000 - 2003) I submitted when I filed my H1b through company A.
Now when I am applying for H1 transfer from company B can I just submit the experince letters from 2004-2007 including the letter from company A so that they don't contradict with what I have submitted before??.
I would also be submitting my education evaluation,w2s,recent paystubs etc. The problem is only with my previous experience letters.
please let me know if this is okay or can there be a problem.Any help would be greatly appreciated. This is urgent for me!!!
Thanks
Laxman
more...
ilamurughu
05-28 02:10 PM
Contributed 100$.
Receipt No: 1301-4365-1962-5826
Receipt No: 1301-4365-1962-5826
2010 partial updo hairstyles_28.
delhiguy79
07-22 12:57 AM
yea it is written but not in the secion of initial evidence ....
So its still a big confusion...............
So its still a big confusion...............
more...
gc_kaavaali
06-07 03:20 PM
Dear XXXXX:
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding immigration policy. I appreciate hearing from you.
You are absolutely right that we need to tackle comprehensive immigration reform now. That is why I recently sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, asking him to make comprehensive immigration reform a priority. It is imperative that we have a workable immigration system that balances the needs of our economy. We cannot keep pushing back reform for another day.
We must be tough and smart to get our immigration system under control. It is unacceptable to have 12 million people in our country living outside the legal system. We must secure the border, and also require the undocumented to register and become legal, pay a fine, pay their taxes, learn English, and pass criminal background checks. Those who have a serious criminal record should be sent back to the country from which they came.
I support comprehensive immigration reform because it will restore common sense and control to our immigration system, so that we are once again both a nation of immigrants and laws. Without reform, cash-strapped local governments are footing the bill for federal inaction and small businesses are reliant on an immigrant workforce face uncertainty. Comprehensive immigration reform will help the economy by turning undocumented workers into legal taxpayers who are paying their fair share. This issue must be addressed in order to make sure that we have a system in place that cracks down on employers who hire illegal immigrants and ensures all are playing by the rules.
Our immigration system is broken, and it cannot be fixed by one small piece of reform. We should address immigration as a whole, and that is a primary goal of mine here in the Senate.
I will continue to represent the priorities of Coloradans and all Americans in a thoughtful and independent manner. Please know that I will keep your concerns in mind as Congress addresses these issues.
For more information about my priorities as a U.S. Senator and about issues of importance to Colorado and our nation, I invite you to visit my website at Michael Bennet - United States Senator for Colorado : Home (http://bennet.senate.gov/). Again, thank you for contacting me.
Thank you for contacting me to express your concerns regarding immigration policy. I appreciate hearing from you.
You are absolutely right that we need to tackle comprehensive immigration reform now. That is why I recently sent a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, asking him to make comprehensive immigration reform a priority. It is imperative that we have a workable immigration system that balances the needs of our economy. We cannot keep pushing back reform for another day.
We must be tough and smart to get our immigration system under control. It is unacceptable to have 12 million people in our country living outside the legal system. We must secure the border, and also require the undocumented to register and become legal, pay a fine, pay their taxes, learn English, and pass criminal background checks. Those who have a serious criminal record should be sent back to the country from which they came.
I support comprehensive immigration reform because it will restore common sense and control to our immigration system, so that we are once again both a nation of immigrants and laws. Without reform, cash-strapped local governments are footing the bill for federal inaction and small businesses are reliant on an immigrant workforce face uncertainty. Comprehensive immigration reform will help the economy by turning undocumented workers into legal taxpayers who are paying their fair share. This issue must be addressed in order to make sure that we have a system in place that cracks down on employers who hire illegal immigrants and ensures all are playing by the rules.
Our immigration system is broken, and it cannot be fixed by one small piece of reform. We should address immigration as a whole, and that is a primary goal of mine here in the Senate.
I will continue to represent the priorities of Coloradans and all Americans in a thoughtful and independent manner. Please know that I will keep your concerns in mind as Congress addresses these issues.
For more information about my priorities as a U.S. Senator and about issues of importance to Colorado and our nation, I invite you to visit my website at Michael Bennet - United States Senator for Colorado : Home (http://bennet.senate.gov/). Again, thank you for contacting me.
hair partial updo hairstyles_28.
webm
09-24 10:58 PM
Apart from Deniel notice I also got LUD on I 140.
Could it be related to old employer revoking I 140?
Since I have transfered after 180 and did Ac 21 - am I covered.
Prince - Did you get any LUD on 140 on the day you got this deniel e mail?
Thanks
Ram
Is your I-140 already approved before you invoked AC21?? Sorry to hear about your denial..keep hope and fight for the justice as much you can..Getting GC became mess now..
Could it be related to old employer revoking I 140?
Since I have transfered after 180 and did Ac 21 - am I covered.
Prince - Did you get any LUD on 140 on the day you got this deniel e mail?
Thanks
Ram
Is your I-140 already approved before you invoked AC21?? Sorry to hear about your denial..keep hope and fight for the justice as much you can..Getting GC became mess now..
more...
mshelat
05-16 09:56 PM
Votes are here:
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2008-10
The amendment was sponsored by Senator Ensign (R-Nevada) who said his staff discovered that the stimulus payments would go to illegal aliens.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSXqiyqLVd4
In reality, the change was the result of lobbying by FAIR, an anti-immigrant group:
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServe...ter_friendly=1
FAIR is accused of having ties to White Supremacists.
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/29303
I have updated the Wikipedia article to reflect this information.
GREAT WORK. I AM SURE WE WILL BE HEARD.
http://www.govtrack.us/congress/vote.xpd?vote=s2008-10
The amendment was sponsored by Senator Ensign (R-Nevada) who said his staff discovered that the stimulus payments would go to illegal aliens.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qSXqiyqLVd4
In reality, the change was the result of lobbying by FAIR, an anti-immigrant group:
http://www.fairus.org/site/PageServe...ter_friendly=1
FAIR is accused of having ties to White Supremacists.
http://www.scrippsnews.com/node/29303
I have updated the Wikipedia article to reflect this information.
GREAT WORK. I AM SURE WE WILL BE HEARD.
hot Partial updo and long
snathan
02-09 09:09 PM
And yes, my contribution to IV so far as been $1000 and involvement in other drives. Your question to me regarding my contribution made me squirm a bit since you might have categorized me with many of IV's freeloaders. That's just like Americans asking me all the time "Are you on an H1-B visa and do you work for a bodyshopper". :)
But I will work on making new contributions as well.
Contribution so far: $1000
Dont take anything personel... I am asking this to all members of the IV.
Lot of people giving me red dot for asking. never mind and focus on the core issues..
But I will work on making new contributions as well.
Contribution so far: $1000
Dont take anything personel... I am asking this to all members of the IV.
Lot of people giving me red dot for asking. never mind and focus on the core issues..
more...
house loose and a partial updo.
Almond
07-17 07:30 PM
You expressed frustration at your situation, and rightfully so, anyone one of us would have felt the same way in your situation. This is so unfair. As far as I'm concerned, you have nothing to apologize for. I hope you get approved soon so you can join the rest of us I485'ers. Good luck to you.
tattoo This partial updo with long
ishwindersidhu
02-13 01:23 AM
I think there is a bipartisan support for the schedule A visa recapture and moreover its a nations documented shortage professions. I think this recapture of nurse visas is imminent no matter what we do.I think our focus should be undiluted towards the CIR, and it should not divert our focus from that. Opposing the nurse shortage would in fact show is in a poor light and we should make an reasonable yet a firm approach towards a long term approach to the issue.There is allready a talk to completely exempt nurses from the visa cap, and i hence feel our opposition would appear irrational. Really appreciate what IV been doing, there is no quick fix to the problem, the goal should be approached systematically and persistently.
more...
pictures and wavy partial updo that
coopheal
03-14 06:32 PM
Can this be true?
Some one with 2006 EB3 INDIA got 485-approval today:
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i485-1/81447145/last-page/
No it cannot be true.
Some one with 2006 EB3 INDIA got 485-approval today:
http://www..com/discussion-forums/i485-1/81447145/last-page/
No it cannot be true.
dresses hair in a partial updo.
Dhundhun
06-27 04:50 PM
i efiled on June 9th and finger scan and photo appt on July 7th. i hope they don't approve my application before then :rolleyes:
Did you sent photo? If not then you can be sure.
Did you sent photo? If not then you can be sure.
more...
makeup hairstyle - partial updo
panky72
06-23 05:18 PM
Called Rep Smith's office. The staffer who attended the phone already knew the bill no's and said that she will pass on the message.
girlfriend We feature updo#39;s, partial
kak1978
06-30 05:27 PM
I had a 2004 PD Labor RIR and my 2006 I-140 used that labor date, because I merely mentioned to an IO at TSC that I had a previously filed labor. My lawyer was shocked when it happened...had never seen it.
So, I wonder if they used your 2004 RIR as your PD. Even then EB 2 is supposed to be unavailable. Oh well, it might help to speak to an IO to get your I-140 PD changed...maybe...
EB2 India is current for April 2004. So may be they did use 2004 RIR as PD. Check with your lawyer, and see if they are aware of this.
So, I wonder if they used your 2004 RIR as your PD. Even then EB 2 is supposed to be unavailable. Oh well, it might help to speak to an IO to get your I-140 PD changed...maybe...
EB2 India is current for April 2004. So may be they did use 2004 RIR as PD. Check with your lawyer, and see if they are aware of this.
hairstyles quot;hair styles partial
priya23
07-23 04:33 PM
anybody with any experiences with barst & mukamal in NY
what_now
05-24 07:38 AM
bump///
hydboy77
02-13 03:37 PM
Dear Administrator2\IV core,
Just getting the provision to file AOS when priority date is not current without the other provisions that are related to pre filing AOS like "removal of semilar\same job restriction when using EAD\AC21" is not good. Dont get me wrong I understand how much the guys who missed out on the july fiasco want to prefile AOS and get EAD but without the provision to remove the restriction of same\semilar job requirement in AC 21 it (EAD) is useless. By now everyone knows that USCIS is heavily issuing RFE or denial notices for h1b transfer and extension. It is just a matter of time before USCIS starts issuing RFE or denial notice on EAD\485 as well. The prime candidate for USCIS to kick out people using EAD\485 is the same or semilar job restriction while using EAD\AC21. If everyone gets to pre file AOS without PD restrictions then USCIS will make using EAD as difficult as using H1b. Please fight for the removal of "same\semilar job requirement in AC 21" along with prefiling AOS so that everybody gets true relief and it really becomes a win win situation, otherwise it is a waste and will speed up uscis making life miserable for EAD workers.
Dear jchan,
We are very interested in this provision. Immigration Voice has heavily invested in this measure, both, legislatively and administrative. We have consistenly advocated for this provision which we believe will curb arm twisting by bad employers, that are like few bad apples in the big basket. Such a provision will help everyone including USCIS, lawyers, genuine companies, and direct+indirect beneficiary. Its a win-win for all.
.
Just getting the provision to file AOS when priority date is not current without the other provisions that are related to pre filing AOS like "removal of semilar\same job restriction when using EAD\AC21" is not good. Dont get me wrong I understand how much the guys who missed out on the july fiasco want to prefile AOS and get EAD but without the provision to remove the restriction of same\semilar job requirement in AC 21 it (EAD) is useless. By now everyone knows that USCIS is heavily issuing RFE or denial notices for h1b transfer and extension. It is just a matter of time before USCIS starts issuing RFE or denial notice on EAD\485 as well. The prime candidate for USCIS to kick out people using EAD\485 is the same or semilar job restriction while using EAD\AC21. If everyone gets to pre file AOS without PD restrictions then USCIS will make using EAD as difficult as using H1b. Please fight for the removal of "same\semilar job requirement in AC 21" along with prefiling AOS so that everybody gets true relief and it really becomes a win win situation, otherwise it is a waste and will speed up uscis making life miserable for EAD workers.
Dear jchan,
We are very interested in this provision. Immigration Voice has heavily invested in this measure, both, legislatively and administrative. We have consistenly advocated for this provision which we believe will curb arm twisting by bad employers, that are like few bad apples in the big basket. Such a provision will help everyone including USCIS, lawyers, genuine companies, and direct+indirect beneficiary. Its a win-win for all.
.
No comments:
Post a Comment